Dismissed¶12

Dinesh Pal Singh Gaur v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC24 Mar 2026WRIA/3125/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ - A No. 3125 of 2026; Dinesh Pal Singh Gaur vs State of U.P. (Principal Secretary, Secondary Education, Lucknow) and 5 others; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.; decided March 24, 2026. Writ petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh after respondent-State (C.S.C.) raised preliminary objection on maintainability. Counsel: Vinay Tripathi and Uma Kant Mishra for petitioner; C.S.C. for respondents. No merits decided; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh petition (liberty to file afresh). ¶12

Dinesh Pal Singh Gaur vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 3125 of 2026

¶3

Dinesh Pal Singh Gaur

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. And 5 Others

¶7

	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Vinay Tripathi, Uma Kant Mishra : C.S.C.
Court No.- 18

¶8

HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent–State.

¶10

Learned Chief Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition.

¶11

Upon the objection being raised, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the present petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition.

¶12

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.

¶13

March 24, 2026 Madhu J.R/P.S

¶14

(Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Dinesh Pal Singh Gaur v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Pal Singh Gaur v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. U.P., Lko. and 3 Others

Laxmi, PNO.-182530829 vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home, Govt. of U.P. Lko., and 2 Others

Jagdish Prasad Srivastava vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Finance Lko. and 3 Others

Rajendra Prasad Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin.Secy. Deptt. of Nagar Vikas and 3 Others

Ravi Prakash Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Sectt. Administration Deptt., Lko.

Uma Shanker Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others