Girraj v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition adjourned: counsel for the respondents was granted two weeks to obtain instructions and the matter was directed to be listed afresh on a subsequent date. No substantive issue was considered or decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 19545 of 2025
Girraj
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Singh, Prashant Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajesh Khare
Court No. - 52
HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
- Two weeks' time is granted to Sri Rajesh Khare, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.4 and 5 to obtain instructions in the matter.
- Put up on 9th February, 2026, as fresh.
(Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Girraj
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Manju Rani Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/19545/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Manju Rani Chauhan
- Order 2 · Manju Rani Chauhan
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court