Dismissed¶11

Nirmal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC16 Feb 2026WRIA/1599/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as withdrawn; minimum pay scale without allowances; protection of already granted benefits till superannuation; termination subject to due process and opportunity of hearing; delinked from bunch matters; Nirmal v. State of U.P.; WRIT - A No. 1599 of 2025; Allahabad High Court; Anish Kumar Gupta, J.; February 16, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner protected till the age of superannuation, subject to satisfactory performance, with termination permissible only after due process of law and an opportunity of hearing. ¶11

Nirmal vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶11

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner was entitled to the minimum pay scale along with allowances, the writ petition having been withdrawn after an order granting the minimum pay scale without any allowances was already given effect to.

¶10

Court's answer

The instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, learned counsel for the petitioner having sought withdrawal since the order regarding the minimum pay scale had already been granted.

¶11

Ratio / Principle

The benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner shall not be withdrawn till the age of superannuation, subject to his satisfactory performance.

¶12

Key takeaways

If the petitioner is found not working to the satisfaction of the department concerned or is guilty of misconduct etc., his services can be terminated by the respondents after following due process of law and giving an opportunity of hearing.ratio¶12
The case is to be delinked from bunch matters and shall not be shown in the cause list.ratio¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.), WRIT - A No. - 1599 of 2025, Nirmal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others, decided February 16, 2026: Writ petition concerning minimum pay scale 'without any allowances' dismissed as withdrawn upon submission by learned counsel for the petitioner that the order granting the minimum pay scale had already been given effect to. The Court directed that benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner shall not be withdrawn till the age of superannuation, subject to satisfactory performance; services terminable for unsatisfactory work or misconduct etc. only after following due process of law and giving an opportunity of hearing. Case delinked from bunch matters and not to be shown in the cause list.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 1599 of 2025

Nirmal

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 3 Others

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Ramendra Kumar Shukla .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶8

Court No. - 39

¶9

HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.

¶10

Sri Ramendra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order with regard to the minimum pay scale, without any allowances, has already been granted to the petitioner, herein, therefore, he seeks to withdraw the instant writ petition.

¶11

Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶12

The benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner shall not be withdrawn till the age of superannuation of the petitioner herein, subject to his satisfactory performance. If the petitioner is found not working to the satisfaction of the department concerned or is guilty of misconduct etc., his services can be terminated by the respondents after following due process of law and giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in this regard.

¶13

Let this case be delinked from bunch matters and shall not be shown in the cause list.

¶14

(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.)

¶15

February 16, 2026

¶16

n.u.

¶17

Digitally signed by :- NASEEM UDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nirmal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nirmal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Manish Tiwari and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Sushma vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Devendra Kumar Tiwari vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ram Naresh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Gajendra Prasad vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Zameer Ahmad and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and 2 Others