Dismissed¶11

Ram Naresh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC16 Feb 2026WRIA/15486/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ram Naresh v. State of U.P. and 3 others; WRIT - A No. 15486 of 2024; Allahabad High Court; Anish Kumar Gupta, J.; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; minimum pay scale without allowances already granted; benefits already granted/accrued not to be withdrawn till age of superannuation; subject to satisfactory performance; termination for misconduct or unsatisfactory work after due process of law; opportunity of hearing; delinked from bunch matters; removed from cause list; pay scale dispute; protection of service benefits.

What did the court decide?

Benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner shall not be withdrawn till his age of superannuation, subject to satisfactory performance; termination for unsatisfactory work or misconduct only after due process of law and an opportunity of hearing. ¶11

Ram Naresh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶11

Issue for consideration

Whether the writ petition should be pursued or withdrawn, given that the order regarding the minimum pay scale, without any allowances, had already been granted to the petitioner.

¶10

Court's answer

The court dismissed the instant writ petition as withdrawn, upon the petitioner's counsel submitting that the order regarding the minimum pay scale, without any allowances, had already been granted to the petitioner.

¶11

Ratio / Principle

The benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner shall not be withdrawn till the age of superannuation of the petitioner, subject to his satisfactory performance.

¶12

Key takeaways

If the petitioner is found not working to the satisfaction of the department concerned or is guilty of misconduct etc., his services can be terminated by the respondents after following due process of law and giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.ratio¶12
This case is to be delinked from bunch matters and shall not be shown in the cause list.obiter¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Court No. 39), WRIT - A No. - 15486 of 2024, decided February 16, 2026 by Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta, J.: The writ petition filed by Ram Naresh against the State of U.P. and 3 others was dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's instance, his counsel submitting that the order regarding the minimum pay scale, without any allowances, had already been granted to him. The court directed that the benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner shall not be withdrawn till his age of superannuation, subject to his satisfactory performance; however, if he is found not working to the satisfaction of the department concerned or is guilty of misconduct etc., his services can be terminated by the respondents after following due process of law and giving an opportunity of hearing. The case was further ordered to be delinked from bunch matters and not shown in the cause list.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 15486 of 2024

Ram Naresh

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 3 Others

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Ramendra Kumar Shukla .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶8

Court No. - 39

¶9

HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.

¶10

Sri Ramendra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order with regard to the minimum pay scale, without any allowances, has already been granted to the petitioner, herein, therefore, he seeks to withdraw the instant writ petition.

¶11

Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶12

The benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner shall not be withdrawn till the age of superannuation of the petitioner herein, subject to his satisfactory performance. If the petitioner is found not working to the satisfaction of the department concerned or is guilty of misconduct etc., his services can be terminated by the respondents after following due process of law and giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in this regard.

¶13

Let this case be delinked from bunch matters and shall not be shown in the cause list.

¶14

(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.)

¶15

February 16, 2026

¶16

n.u.

¶17

Digitally signed by :- NASEEM UDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Naresh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Naresh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Tiwari and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Sushma vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Devendra Kumar Tiwari vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nirmal vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Gajendra Prasad vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Zameer Ahmad and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and 2 Others