Disposed¶22

Chhatrapal v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC14 May 2026WPIL/3923/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Encroachment removal; public pond and Usar land; gata nos. 406 and 407; Village Karmon, Tehsil Khaga, District Fatehpur; respondent no. 5 as encroacher; Section 67(1) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 proceedings; Tehsildar Khaga; mandamus; PIL disposed with time-bound direction of three months; Allahabad High Court, Arun Kumar, J., 15.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Tehsildar, Khaga, District Fatehpur to decide the cases under Section 67(1) of the Revenue Code pending before him, in accordance with law, after hearing all the concerned parties, within three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of the order. ¶22

Chhatrapal Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3923 of 2025

¶3

Chhatrapal

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. And 4 Others	.....Respond
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Sharad Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Azad Rai, C.S.C.

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Court No. - 55

¶9

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

¶10

Heard Sri Sharad Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Rajan Chauhan holding brief of Sri Azad Rai for the respondent no. 4.

¶11

The present petition has been filed for the following relief:-

¶12

"(i) issue a writ of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent authority to immediately take action for removing the encroachment of respondent no. 5 over the gata number 406 and 407 recorded as public pond & Usar land in revenue record, situated in Village Karmon, Tehsil Khaga, District Fatehpur."

¶13

In pursuance of the direction of this Court, instructions dated 11.02.2026, sent by Tehsildar Khaga, District Fatehpur, has been placed before the Court, which is taken on record.

¶14

A perusal of the aforesaid instructions shows that against the encroachers of Plot Nos. 406 and 407, proceedings under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, have already been initiated and following cases are registered against them, before the Tehsildar Khaga, District Fatehpur:-

¶15

"T202602250301762; T202602250301763; T202602250301764;

¶16

T202602250301759; T202602250301760; T202602250301761;

¶17

T202602250301751; T202602250301752; T202602250301753;

¶18

WPIL No. 3923 of 2025

¶19

¶20

T202602250301754; T202602250301755; T202602250301756;

¶21

T202602250301757; T202602250301758"

¶22

In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to the Tehsildar Khaga, District Fatehpur, to decide the aforesaid cases under Section 67(1) of the Revenue Code, pending before him, in accordance with law, after hearing all the concerned parties, within a period of three months, from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order.

(Arun Kumar,J.)

May 15, 2026

Ranjeet Sahu

Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chhatrapal v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhatrapal v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Amrjit vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Arvind Kumar Singh @ Behosh Jaunpuri vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Rajesh Pratap Singh vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Mulmul Ram vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Uma Shankar Rai vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 10 Others

Yogesh Vs State of U.P and 9 Others