Rajitram v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 8 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Court No. 8; Jaspreet Singh, J.; PIL/WPIL No. 372 of 2026, Rajitram v. State of U.P. thru Secy. Revenue Lko. and 8 others; decided April 30, 2026; encroachment removal; Plot Nos. 189, 187 and 24-Ga; Gaon Sabha; Tehsildar Bikapur, District Ayodhya; written instructions dated 18.04.2026; 29 cases already initiated; petitioner's non-disclosure; petition dismissed; State expected to conclude and enforce proceedings expeditiously.
What did the court decide?
The Court declined to entertain the PIL because the petitioner had not disclosed the fact that 29 encroachment-removal cases concerning the plots had already been initiated and were under active consideration, facts the petitioner could have investigated before filing. ¶15