Disposed¶12

Narendra Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC4 May 2026WPIL/1169/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

PIL; illegal encroachment; banjar land; Plot No.535; 0.0610 hectare; Village Suhai; Tehsil Bhanpur; District Basti; Section 67 Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code 2006; alternative remedy; disposal with liberty; Amaruddin Ansari PIL No.655 of 2026 decided 18.03.2026; Kanhaiya Lal 2023 (12) ADJ 226; Narendra Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 others; Allahabad High Court; Arun Kumar, J.; order dated May 5, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the appropriate authority under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; any such application to be considered and decided in accordance with law. ¶12

Narendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1169 of 2026

¶3

Narendra Kumar

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others	.....Responden
Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Ram Mani Upadhyay, Shantanu Pandey : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta

¶6

.....Respondent(s)

¶7

Court No. - 55

¶8

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. Sri Pankaj Kumar Gupta has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no. 3.

¶10

The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 2 to take necessary action against the respondent no. 4 for removing illegal encroachment over Plot No.535, area 0.0610 hectare, recorded as banjar in the relevant revenue records, relating to Village Suhai, Tehsil Bhanpur, District Basti.

¶11

Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach appropriate authority by moving an application under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Amaruddin Ansari Vs. State of U.P. and 5 others , passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No.655 of 2026, decided on 18.03.2026, upholding the Coordinate Bench decision of this Court in the case of Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2023 (12) ADJ 226 .

¶12

In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the appropriate authority, under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. If any such application is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law.

¶13

May 5, 2026 Ranjeet Sahu

¶14

(Arun Kumar,J.)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Narendra Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narendra Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sanjeev vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Gram Sabha Mathiya Gosai, Tehsil-Harriya, through Its Village Rpadhan Ram Narayan Vs State of Up and 5 Others

Jaipal Singh vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Sohan Ram Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Kulliyatul Banatir Razviya Educational and Welfare Society vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Mithilesh Kumar Shukla Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others