Badan Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS; the High Court passed no substantive order, merely directing that the matter be put up as fresh.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9607 of 2025
Badan Singh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kuldeep Singh Chahar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
Put up as fresh on 12.02.2026.
(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
February 9, 2026
A. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Badan Singh
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/9607/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Rajiv Lochan Shukla
- Order 2 — this page · Rajiv Lochan Shukla
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court