Disposed¶13

Smt Shamim v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 Feb 2026NABAIL/1499/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; interim anticipatory bail granted in event of arrest; S. 482 BNSS; Sections 70(1), 351(3), 87, 61(2) BNS; Section 67 IT Act; Case Crime No. 296 of 2025; Police Station Mansoorpur; District Muzaffar Nagar; Smt Shamim v. State of U.P.; NABAIL No. 1499 of 2026; Allahabad High Court; Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.; personal bond and two sureties; bail conditions; cancellation on breach; A.G.A. instructions incomplete; listed fresh 25.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail granted in the event of arrest, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to stated conditions; the application itself was not finally decided and was directed to be put up as fresh on 25.02.2026. ¶13

Smt Shamim vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶13

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant, Smt Shamim, arraigned in Case Crime No. 296 of 2025 (Sections 70(1), 351(3), 87, 61(2) B.N.S. and Section 67 of I.T. Act, Police Station Mansoorpur, District Muzaffar Nagar), should be released on interim anticipatory bail in the event of arrest.

¶13

Court's answer

In the event of the arrest of the applicant in Case Crime No. 296 of 2025, she shall be released on interim anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned.

¶13

Ratio / Principle

The interim anticipatory bail is subject to conditions: the applicant shall make herself available for interrogation as and when required; shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to dissuade disclosure of facts; shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court; shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; and in case of breach of any condition, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶20

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Hon'ble Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.), by order dated February 16, 2026 in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 1499 of 2026 (Smt Shamim v. State of U.P.), granted interim anticipatory bail to the applicant in the event of her arrest in Case Crime No. 296 of 2025, Police Station Mansoorpur, District Muzaffar Nagar, registered under Sections 70(1), 351(3), 87, 61(2) B.N.S. and Section 67 of I.T. Act, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer/Court concerned. Release was made subject to conditions: availability for interrogation as and when required; no inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts; no departure from India without previous permission of the Court; and no pressurizing/intimidating prosecution witnesses, with liberty to the Court concerned to cancel bail on breach of any condition. The learned A.G.A. stated he had not received complete instructions; the vakalatnama of the informant's counsel was taken on record, and the application was directed to be listed fresh on 25.02.2026.

Smt Shamim v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Shamim v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Aman Yadav Sipahi Alias Utkarsh vs State of U.P. and Another

Shyam Pyare Tiwari vs State of U.P.

Daya Shankar Prajapati and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Soni vs State of U.P. and Another

Karmaveer Singh @ Kishan Veer vs State of U.P. and Another

Prakash Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others