Disposed¶10

Naushad v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC28 Jan 2026NABAIL/737/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS; interim protection extended till next date of listing; matter listed fresh on 30.3.2026; Naushad v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court; single judge (Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J.); order dated February 25, 2026; no final decision on bail; Mohammad Faisal Khan for applicant; G.A. for State.

What did the court decide?

Interim order, if any, extended till the next date of listing; case to be listed as fresh on 30.3.2026. ¶10

Naushad vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 737 of 2026

Naushad

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Faisal Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 72

¶9

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶10

Heard Shri Mohammad Faisal Khan, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri B.P. Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime no.159 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 308 of I.P.C., Police Station Budhana, District Muzaffar Nagar, with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

¶12

It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. It is further submitted that there is a cross case to the present case. It is further submitted that as per first information report, 9 named and 5 unknown persons are said to have assaulted the first informant side, as a result of which, two persons are said to have received grievous injuries on the first informant side but none of their injuries are dangerous to life. It is also submitted that the applicant is having no criminal history. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶13

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received instructions as yet.

¶14

It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v.

¶15

NABAIL No. 737 of 2026

¶16

¶17

State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶18

In the event of arrest of the applicant- Naushad involved in the aforesaid case crime shall be released on interim anticipatory bail till 25.02.2026 on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, with the following conditions :-

¶19

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶20

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶21

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶22

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶23

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶24

List this case on 25.02.2026 as fresh.

¶25

Learned AGA is directed to obtain instructions in the matter by the next date.

¶26

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶27

January 28, 2026 RKM

¶28

Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Naushad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naushad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rama vs State of U.P. and Another

Prabhudayal vs State of U.P. and Another

Anand Gupta Alias Anand Kumar Gupta vs State of U.P. and Another

Sanjay Kumar Gupta and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Kuldeep vs State of U.P.

Harveer and Another vs State of U.P. and Another