Disposed¶10

Jasbir v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Apr 2026NABAIL/3603/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS by Jasbir against State of U.P. and Another, Allahabad High Court, Court No. 71, Justice Avnish Saxena. By order dated April 16, 2026, the Court adjourned the matter because the learned A.G.A. sought time for instructions, and listed it fresh on 28.4.2026. No ruling on the merits of the bail prayer; no precedents cited; no amounts involved.

What the court decided

AI extract

Jasbir vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3603 of 2026

Jasbir

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Vikas Sharma
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 71

¶7

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

¶8

Sri Vikas Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. seeks time for instructions.

¶10

List on 28.4.2026 as fresh.

¶11

April 16, 2026

¶12

Krishna*

¶13

(Avnish Saxena,J.)

¶14

Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jasbir v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Jasbir v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gautam Chauhan vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Brijesh Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Mani Ram vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Mukesh Chauhan and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Jitendra vs State of U.P.

Ajay vs State of U.P. and Another