Arpit Singh vs State of U.P.

2. Present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 1 of 2025, under Section 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of UP Gangster and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Siddharth Nagar, District Siddharth Nagar with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

¶13

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and he has an apprehension that he may be arrested in the above-mentioned case. He further submits that no offence is made out against the applicant. It is submitted that the applicant was granted interim protection from arrest by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.1.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 1337 of 2025. It is further submitted that applicant is on bail in a solitary case shown against him in the gang chart and he is having no other criminal history. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶14

4. On the other hand, learned AGA has opposed the prayer and submitted that the applicant has not explained the status of the case crime no. 45 of 2021 under Sections 323, 324, 504 IPC.

¶15

5. It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra , (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, the Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶16

NABAIL No. 354 of 2026

¶17

2

¶18

6. Considering the above submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on merits, the applicant- Arpit Singh involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned till 16.2.2026 with the following conditions :-

¶19

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶20

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶21

(iii) The applicant would cooperate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of interim interim anticipatory bail bail.

¶22

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶23

7. In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant herein.

¶24

8. List this case as fresh on 16.2.2026.

¶25

9. The applicant is directed to file supplementary affidavit bringing on record the status of the said case crime.

¶26

January 19, 2026 Abhishek

¶27

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶28

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Arpit Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arpit Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Tiwari vs State of U.P. and Another

Arjun @ Ankur Saini vs State of U.P. and Another

Arpit Saxena vs State of U.P.

Vijay Kumar Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another

Jasveer and Another vs State of U.P.

Zamirul Ui Islam and Another vs State of U.P.