Devendra Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime no.678 of 2024, under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of B.N.S. and Section 66 I.T. Act, Police Station Shikohabad, District Firozabad, with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

¶12

It is further contended by learned counsel for he applicant that six coaccused have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide orders passed on various dates and the orders of the co-accused have been annexed with the memo of application. It is further submitted that the applicant was served a notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS during investigation and now charge sheet in this case has been submitted. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶13

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received instructions as yet.

¶14

It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble

¶15

NABAIL No. 327 of 2026

¶16

2

¶17

Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶18

In the event of arrest of the applicant- Devendra Yadav involved in the aforesaid case crime shall be released on interim anticipatory bail till 16.02.2026 on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, with the following conditions :-

¶19

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶20

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶21

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶22

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶23

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶24

List this case on 16.02.2026 as fresh.

¶25

Learned AGA is directed to obtain instructions in the matter by the next date.

¶26

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶27

January 19, 2026

¶28

RKM

¶29

Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Devendra Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devendra Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sherkhan vs State of U.P.

Sohan Lal and 10 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Santoshi Devi and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Mukesh vs State of U.P. and Another

Reshampal and Another vs State of U.P.

Anar Singh vs State of U.P.