Amit Singh vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3124 of 2026

Amit Singh		.....Applicant(s)
	Versus
State of U.P.		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Satya Priya Upadhyay
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	Raj Kumar Singh, G.A.

¶4

Court No. - 70

¶5

HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant and Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State.

¶7

This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 175 of 2025 under Sections - 105, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) BNS, Police Station-Rasra, District - Ballia, during the pendency of trial.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that applicant has not committed any offence as alleged by prosecution. It is next submitted that due to property dispute, applicant has been roped in the present matter. It is next submitted that applicant is not having any previous criminal history and he has been granted interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 01.04.2026. It is also submitted that in the event the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶9

Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that the allegations levelled against the applicant are specific and serious in nature. He further submitted that applicant along with other co-accused persons after entering in the house made assault upon the informant and deceased through wooden stick and in the incident, deceased sustained injuries on her head and during

¶10

NABAIL No. 3124 of 2026

¶11

2

¶12

treatment, she died due to injury. He further submitted that evidence available on record and statements of the independent witnesses also corroborate the prosecution case, therefore, the instant anticipatory bail application is liable to be rejected.

¶13

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the record, this Court finds that the allegations made in the First Information Report are specific and prima facie supported by the material collected during investigation. The charge-sheet has already been filed against the applicant after due investigation.

¶14

Considering the nature and gravity of the accusations, the material available on record, and the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find any good ground for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant. In case the applicant has any grievance with regard to the proceedings, he may avail appropriate remedy.

¶15

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present anticipatory bail application is hereby rejected .

¶16

It is made clear that observations made in the instant anticipatory bail shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses.

¶17

(Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.)

¶18

May 6, 2026

¶19

KK Patel

¶20

Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amit Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Juvenile X Vs State of U.P. and Another

Archana Maddheshiya vs State of U.P. and Another

Bablu Khan vs State of U.P.

X Juvenile vs State of Up and 3 Others

X Juvenile vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

X Juvenile vs State of U.P. and Another