Vinay v. State of U.P. and 3 Others; anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNSS; Allahabad High Court; Siddharth, J.; interim procedural order; amendment application directed; informant vakalatnama; AGA counter affidavit taken on record; listed 17.4.2026; no merits decided; no cases cited.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2895 of 2026
Vinay
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
| .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Ashish Srivastava |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
Sri Gaurav Srivastava, Advocate, has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant and counter affidavit has been filed by learned AGA for State, which are taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner will file appropriate amendment application in this case, within a week.
List this case on 17.4.2026.
(Siddharth,J.)
April 10, 2026
Ruchi Agrahari
Digitally signed by :- RUCHI AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant Vinay is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS (inferred from the case type; not addressed in this order).medium confidence¶2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
How this case reached the court
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the informant by Sri Gaurav Srivastava, Advocate, and counter affidavit filed by learned AGA for the State; both taken on record.¶10
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
