Vishal Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

2. Present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 790 of 2025, under Sections 8/22/29 NDPS Act, Police Station Civil Lines, District Moradabad with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

¶12

3. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received any instructions as yet.

¶13

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and he has an apprehension that he may be arrested in the above-mentioned case. He further submits that no offence is made out against the applicant. It is further submitted that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the applicant and name of the applicant has surfaced in the statement of co-accused Vikas and from whose possession 14.44 grams of smack is said to have been recovered and the said co-accused Vikas has already been granted regular bail by the learned Sessions Court. It is further submitted that the applicant is having criminal history of three cases, which has been explained in the memo of application. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he

¶14

NABAIL No. 1707 of 2026

¶15

2

¶16

shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶17

5. Name of the applicant has surfaced in the statement of co-accused Vikas and from whose possession 14.44 grams of smack is said to have been recovered and the said co-accused Vikas has already been granted regular bail by the learned Sessions Court.

¶18

6. It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra , (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, the Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶19

7. Considering the above submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant as well as the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Toofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu , 2021 (4) SCC 1 and without expressing any opinion on merits, the applicant- Vishal Singh involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned till 1.4.2026 with the following conditions :-

¶20

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶21

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶22

(iii) The applicant would cooperate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of interim interim anticipatory bail bail.

¶23

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the

¶24

NABAIL No. 1707 of 2026

¶25

3

¶26

Court concerned.

¶27

8. In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant herein.

¶28

9. List this case as fresh on 1.4.2026.

¶29

10. In the meantime, learned AGA may obtain instructions in the matter.

¶30

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶31

February 19, 2026

¶32

Abhishek

¶33

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vishal Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vikrant vs State of U.P.

Dinesh Sharma and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Vikas Kumar vs State of U.P.

Kumari Dipti Dubey vs State of U.P. and Another

Sachin vs State of U.P.

Suraj Saini vs State of U.P. and Another