Disposed¶9

Narayan Singh @ Bhola v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC26 Feb 2026NABAIL/1695/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNSS; maintainability objection; complaint case; summons to accused; Asheesh Kumar vs. State of U.P. and another (Crl. Misc. AB U/S 482 BNSS No. 4464 of 2025); Narayan Singh @ Bhola; State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court; Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.; matter adjourned/listed fresh for 27.02.2026 at 2:00 PM; no decision on merits.

What the court decided

AI extract

Narayan Singh @ Bhola vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1695 of 2026

¶3

Narayan Singh @ Bhola

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

		Versus
State of U.P. and Another				...	..Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Saurabh Pandey	Pandey,	Suresh	Chandra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.
Court No.- 71

¶6

HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. objects to the maintainability of the application claiming therein that the applicant has been summoned in a complaint case and in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Asheesh Kumar vs. State of U.P. and another (Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 4464 of 2025), an anticipatory bail in a complaint case is not maintainable.

¶8