Chandrapal and 5 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

2. Present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case No. 10130 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 392 IPC, Police Station Sadar Bazaar, District Saharanpur with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicants may be released on bail.

¶12

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants are innocent and they have an apprehension that they may be arrested in the above-mentioned case. He further submits that no offence is made out against the applicants. It is submitted that the applicants have been summoned to face trial in a complaint case for the offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 392 IPC and non-bailable warrant has been issued, therefore, the applicants are apprehending their arrest. It was also submitted that applicants undertake to co-operate during trial and they would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail. It is further submitted that some time may be given to him to address the Court on the maintainability of present application in a complaint case, therefore, some interim protection may be granted to the applicants so that he may be able to place certain case laws in support of his case.

¶13

4. On the other hand, learned AGA has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶14

5. It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra , (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, the Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that

¶15

NABAIL No. 1622 of 2026

¶16

2

¶17

Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶18

6. Considering the above submissions of the learned counsel for the applicants and without expressing any opinion on merits, the applicants- Chandrapal, Amit, Pawan, Lakhan, Soniya, Seema involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on interim anticipatory bail on their furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned till 31.3.2026 with the following conditions :-

¶19

(i) The applicants shall not tamper with evidence and that they would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶20

(ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶21

(iii) The applicants would cooperate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of interim interim anticipatory bail bail.

¶22

(iv) The applicants shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶23

7. In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicants herein.

¶24

8. List this case as fresh on 31.3.2026.

¶25

March 9, 2026 Abhishek

¶26

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶27

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chandrapal and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrapal and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

X Juvenile vs State of U.P. and Another

Ravi Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Aman Yadav and Another vs State of U.P.

X Juvenile vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

X Juvenile vs State of U.P. and Another

Anek Singh vs State of U.P.