Mohd Hashim v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Mohd Hashim v. State of U.P. and another — Application U/S 529 BNSS No. 834 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, decided 24 March 2026 by Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J. Procedural order arising from a dishonoured cheque: vakalatnama filed for opposite party no. 2 (Amit Shukla, Vikal Kumar Kushwaha, Saurabh); counsel stated the cheque stands dishonoured and payment is ready; the Court directed personal appearance of both parties on the next fixed date, a bank draft of the amount in favour of the applicant, and fresh listing on 2-4-2026. Keywords: Section 529 BNSS; cheque dishonoured; bank draft; personal appearance; vakalatnama; fresh case; interim directions.
What did the court decide?
Interim procedural directions only; the application was not finally decided. (i) The case is to be presented as a fresh case on 2-4-2026; (ii) the applicant and opposite party no. 2 are to remain personally present in Court on the next fixed date; (iii) opposite party no. 2 is to get a bank draft of the aforesaid (cheque) amount prepared in favour of the applicant on that date and hand it over to the applicant the same day.