Disposed¶14

Vijay Agrawal v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC4 Feb 2026NA529/288/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under S. 529 BNSS No. 288 of 2026; Vijay Agrawal v. State of U.P. and Another; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J.; order dated 04.02.2026; dishonoured cheque; money dispute; suit pending before court below; notice to opposite party no.2 through Chief Judicial Magistrate; personal appearance directed on 25.02.2026; demand draft of cheque amount; withdrawal of suit offered by applicant's counsel; next listing 25.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim directions only: notice issued to opposite party no.2 through the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned; applicant and opposite party no.2 directed to appear in person on 25.02.2026; opposite party no.2 directed to prepare a demand draft of the amount in question, if ready; matter put up again as fresh on 25.02.2026. ¶14

Vijay Agrawal vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 288 of 2026

¶3

Vijay Agrawal

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Akhilendra Singh, Manoj Kumar Gupta
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 50

¶7

HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J.

¶8

Supplementary affidavit has been filed annexing with the copy of the Cheque which was dishonored, is taken on record.

¶9

The matter relates to money dispute.

¶10

During argument, learned counsel for the appellant states that the cheque in question has been dishonored regarding which applicant has filed a suit before the court below which is still pending adjudication. He further states that if the opposite party no.2 returns the aforesaid amount to the applicant as mentioned in the cheque in question then he will withdraw his case.

¶11