Shadab and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCNA528/51833/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application under Section 528 BNSS challenging proceedings; court noted charge framed on 12.12.2024 was not challenged and permitted applicants to amend the application within a week to challenge the framing of charge, with listing as fresh on 11.03.2026.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
¶2
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 51833 of 2025
¶3
Shadab And Another
¶4
.....Applicant(s)
¶5
Versus
¶6
State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
¶7
Court No. - 81
¶8
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
¶9
- At the very outset, learned A.G.A. pointed out that charge has been framed in this case on 12.12.2024, but the charge dated 12.12.2024, has not been challenged in the present application.
¶10
- Learned counsel for the applicants is permitted to make necessary correction in the office within a period of one week, challenging the order dated 12.12.2024, whereby the charge has been framed.
¶11
- Put up this case on 11.03.2026, as fresh.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Shadab And Another
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/51833/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court