Disposed¶18

Sahil @ Khujli v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC12 Feb 2026NA528/364/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Common/single bail bond and two sureties accepted across multiple cases; direction to trial court under Section 528 BNSS; reliance on Supreme Court decision Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P., SLP (Cri) No.8914-8915 of 2018 (29.10.2018); applicant Sahil @ Khujli vs State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 16; decided 12.03.2026 by Brij Raj Singh, J.; application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Trial court directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in all the two cases mentioned in paragraph-5 of the application and to release the applicant on bail. ¶18

Sahil @ Khujli vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 364 of 2026

Sahil @ Khujli

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Sudhaker Prakash
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 16

¶10

HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶12

The present application has been filed seeking a direction to the court concerned to accept a personal bond and two sureties in all two cases mentioned in paragraph-5 of the memo of application.

¶13

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is involved in two cases and has been granted bail, but he is unable to provide separate bail bonds and sureties in all cases. He, therefore, prays that trial court may be directed to accept the same bail bond and sureties in all two cases mentioned in paragraph-5 of the memo of application. In support of his submission, he has placed reliance upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.8914-8915 of 2018, Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P., dated 29.10.2018 to establish that the Supreme Court in the aforesaid case has directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties for all cases.

¶14

Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid legal proposition.

¶15

Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the dictum of the Supreme Court in this regard, the trial court is directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in all the two cases mentioned in paragraph-5 of the application and release the applicant on bail.

¶16

NA528 No. 364 of 2026

¶17

¶18

6. Application stands disposed of.

¶19

(Brij Raj Singh,J.)

¶20

March 12, 2026 Sachin

¶21

Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sahil @ Khujli v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahil @ Khujli v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Fatima Khatoon vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others

Suneel Kumar @ Suneel Kori vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Ayush @ Ayush Shukla vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and 7 Others

Syed Masood Husain vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Lucknow and Another

Prem Narayan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Abdul Wahid vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.