Disposed¶16

Shakir v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC4 May 2026NA528/36139/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Sanjiv Kumar, J.), Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 36139 of 2025, Shakir v. State of U.P. and another, decided May 5, 2026 — quashing of S.T. No. 1755 of 2025 / Case Crime No. 0048 of 2018, S. 307 I.P.C., P.S. Seohara, District Bijnor, charge-sheet No. 122 of 2018 (21.04.2018) and summoning order dated 04.07.2018 not pressed on merits; liberty granted to file discharge application within four weeks with direction for expeditious disposal by reasoned and speaking order; application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the applicant to move discharge application(s) within four weeks; any such application(s) to be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking order. The quashing prayer was not pressed on merits. ¶16

Shakir Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36139 of 2025

¶3

Shakir

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versu	s
State Of U.P. And Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) :	Umair Mahmood, Vivek Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s):	G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 83

¶7

HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶9

This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants to quash entire proceeding of Session Trial No.1755 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No.0048 of 2018, under Section 307 I.P.C., Police Station Seohara, District Bijnor as well as charge-sheet No.122 of 2018, dated 21.04.2018 as well as summoning order dated 04.07.2018.

¶10

After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submit that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same. He also submits that applicant has already been granted bail.

¶11

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

¶12

In view of above, it is provided that applicant is

¶13

NA528 No. 36139 of 2025

¶14

¶15

permitted to move his discharge application(s) within four weeks' from today and in case any such application(s) is/are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order.

¶16

With above directions this application stands disposed of.

¶17

May 5, 2026 Amit

¶18

(Sanjiv Kumar,J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shakir v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shakir v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Krishna Mohan Shukla and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajesh Kumar and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Shyam Singh Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Uday Bhan Dixit and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shubham Pandey and 8 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohit Saini Alias Anubhav Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another