Ram Kripal Chaudhary v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court interim order under Section 528 BNSS (application no. 3270 of 2026, decided 29.01.2026, Nand Prabha Shukla, J.); quashing petition against summoning order dated 16.03.2023 of Judicial Magistrate, Siddharthnagar and proceedings of Complaint Case No. 10987 of 2022 (Ram Prakash Yadav v. Ram Kripal Chaudhary) under Sections 420, 504 and 323 IPC, Police Station-Mohana, District-Siddharthnagar; plea that dispute is civil in nature given a criminal cloak and civil remedy of recovery suit available; notice to opposite party No. 2; counter-affidavit four weeks, rejoinder two weeks; complaint proceedings kept in abeyance until further orders; listed 27.03.2026.
What did the court decide?
Interim order at notice stage: notice issued to opposite party No. 2, returnable at an early date; opposite party No. 2 to file counter-affidavit within four weeks and rejoinder-affidavit within two weeks thereafter; matter listed on 27.03.2026 in the daily cause list; until further orders, the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 10987 of 2022 kept in abeyance. Application otherwise pending, not finally disposed.