Disposed¶17

Parvej Alias Parinda v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC13 May 2026NA528/19853/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of non-bailable warrant (NBW); Application under S. 528 BNSS; sections 379 and 411 IPC; Case Crime No.414 of 2021, P.S. Pilkhuwa, District Hapur; Case No.10113 of 2021 before CJM Hapur; refusal of quashing prayer; time-bound appearance/surrender within 15 days; interim protection from coercive action; plea against fresh bond and surety not decided; Allahabad High Court, single judge (Saurabh Srivastava, J.), decision dated May 14, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of: quashing prayer refused, but applicant permitted to appear before the court concerned in pursuance of the NBW dated 06.03.2025 within 15 days, with protection from coercive action during that period; thereafter the court below to proceed as per law. ¶17

Parvej Alias Parinda Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶17

Issue for consideration

Whether the non-bailable warrant dated 06.03.2025 passed in Case No.10113 of 2021 (arising out of Case Crime No.414 of 2021, P.S. Pilkhuwa, District Hapur) ought to be quashed. +1 more

¶8

Court's answer

On perusal of the record, the Court found this not to be a case requiring its interference; no ground was made out in the application on which the impugned order could be set aside.

¶9

Ratio / Principle

The prayer sought through the instant application (quashing of the NBW) was refused.

¶10

Key takeaways

The applicant was directed to appear before the court concerned pursuant to the NBW dated 06.03.2025 within 15 days; no coercive action was to be initiated against him till then, and after expiry of that period the concerned court was directed to proceed as per law.ratio¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Saurabh Srivastava, J.) disposed of an application under S. 528 BNSS seeking quashing of a non-bailable warrant dated 06.03.2025 issued in Case No.10113 of 2021 (State of U.P. vs. Aafeem and Others) under sections 379, 411 IPC, arising out of Case Crime No.414 of 2021, P.S. Pilkhuwa, District Hapur, pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur. Finding no ground for interference on the record, the Court refused the quashing prayer but, as learned counsel sought liberty to surrender and the AGA had no objection, directed the applicant to appear before the court concerned within 15 days, ordered that no coercive action be initiated against him during that period, and left the court below free to proceed as per law on its expiry. The plea that the applicant, already on bail, should not be compelled to furnish a fresh bond and surety was noted but not expressly decided.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 19853 of 2026

¶3

Parvej Alias Parinda

¶4

Versus .....	Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another .	....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankita Tiwari, Srivastava, Srivastava, Shahru	Kushagra Saumya kh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 77

¶6

HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶7

This matter has been taken up in the mentioned category. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State.

¶8

The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of non-bailable warrant dated 06.03.2025 passed in Case No.10113 of 2021 (State of U.P. vs. Aafeem and Others) under sections 379, 411 IPC, arising out of Case Crime No.414 of 2021, P.S. Pilkhuwa, District- Hapur, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur.

¶9

On perusal of entire record appended along with instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order can be set aside.

¶10

Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.

¶11

Lastly, learned counsel for applicant has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned in pursuance to NBW order dated 06.03.2025 to which learned AGA has no objection.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter,

¶13

NA528 No. 19853 of 2026

¶14

¶15

applicant is hereby directed to appear before the learned court concerned in pursuance to impugned NBW order dated 06.03.2025 within 15 days from today. Till 15 days from today, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicant. After the expiry of aforesaid period of 15 days, learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law.

¶16

Lastly, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has already been granted bail and as such learned court concerned may not compel him to prefer fresh bond and surety.

¶17

With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of .

¶18

May 14, 2026 Saif

¶19

(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)

¶20

Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Parvej Alias Parinda v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvej Alias Parinda v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sri Rajukhan vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish Kumar Chaturvedi and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Brajesh Kumari and Another vs State of Up and Another

Sunil Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sadhna Dixit Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajaram Paswan Vs State of U.P. and Another