Quashing petition against cognizance/summoning order and charge sheet was not pressed. Applicant sought liberty to file bail before the trial court; the High Court directed that any such bail application be decided expeditiously in view of Satender Kumar Antil and disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1930 of 2026
Amit Tiwari
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandrika Rani Upadhyay, Satyam Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 16
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
NA528 No. 1930 of 2026
2
Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51 .
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
May 14, 2026
V. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on
(2022)10 SCC 51 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Amit Tiwari
State of U.P. thru Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
