Disposed¶15

Rajesh Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC1 May 2026NA528/1724/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajesh Yadav vs State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 16; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 1724 of 2026; Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing petition; Special Case No. 26 of 2026; charge sheet dated 14.09.2025; Case Crime No. 188 of 2025; Police Station Auras, District Unnao; Sections 333, 109, 115(2), 351(3), 352, 191(2), 191(3), 89 BNS; Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act; surrender and bail direction; expeditious disposal of bail application; Shree Prakash Singh, J.; disposed on 01.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction that upon the applicant's surrender before the Court concerned and filing of a bail application, the bail application shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously as possible. ¶15

Rajesh Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1724 of 2026

Rajesh Yadav

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Srees Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shivanshi Mishra

¶7

Court No. - 16

¶8

HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶10

Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with prayer for quashing of the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 26 of 2026 (State Vs. Rajesh Yadav), and the impugned Charge sheet dated 14.09.2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 188 of 2025, under Sections 333, 109, 115(2), 351(3), 352, 191(2), 191(3), 89 BNS and Section 3(2)(v) S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station - Auras, District - Unnao, pending in the court of learned Additional Session Judge / SC ST, Unnao, in the interest of justice.

¶11

After argument at length, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the interest of justice would be served, if the bail application of the applicant is directed to be considered by the Court concerned. He further submits that the applicant shall surrender before the Court concerned and will file the bail application. He further added that this Court may be pleased to direct the Court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicant within stipulated period of time, as fixed by this Court.

¶12

In view of the aforesaid submissions, present application is disposed off with a direction that in case, the applicant surrenders before the Court

¶13

NA528 No. 1724 of 2026

¶14

¶15

concerned and applies for bail, his bail application shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously as possible.

¶16

(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)

¶17

May 1, 2026

¶18

Raj

¶19