Disposed¶14

Suraj Alias Vivek v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko.

Allahabad HC1 May 2026BAIL/3162/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench); Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3162 of 2026; applicant Suraj alias Vivek vs State of U.P.; Case Crime No. 14 of 2026; Sections 115(2), 351(3), 333, 64 BNS (corresponding to Sections 323, 506, 452, 376 IPC); P.S. Munshiganj, District Amethi; bail during trial sought; informant's counsel Dileep Kumar Tiwari vakalatnama taken on record; two weeks for counter affidavit; rejoinder within a week thereafter; listed fresh week commencing 25.05.2026; Manish Kumar, J.; dated May 1, 2026; no merits decision.

What did the court decide?

No decision on the bail merits; two weeks' time granted to learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant to file counter affidavit; rejoinder affidavit, if any, within a week thereafter; case to be listed as fresh in the week commencing 25.05.2026. ¶14

Suraj Alias Vivek vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3162 of 2026

Suraj Alias Vivek

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko.

¶7

	.....	Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Amit Kumar Singh, Virijendra Singh, Vishwadip Singh	Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A., Dileep Kumar Tiwari

¶8

Court No. - 13

¶9

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.

¶10

Shri Dileep Kumar Tiwari, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the informant and has filed his vakalatnama, which is taken on record.

¶11

By means of this instant bail application, the applicant, who is involved in Case Crime No. 14 of 2026, u/s 115(2), 351(3), 333, 64 B.N.S (corresponding sections 323, 506, 452 and 376 I.P.C), Police Station Munshiganj, District Amethi is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶12