Disposed¶14

Bhola @ Rajkumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC20 Jan 2026NA528/1641/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, single bench (Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.), Application U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1641 of 2026, decided January 20, 2026: interim stay of criminal proceedings (Case No. 3108 of 2025 / Case Crime No. 177 of 2025, Sections 333, 115(2), 352, 118(2) of B.N.S., P.S. Hasaayan, District Hathras) in view of settlement between parties; two weeks to file supplementary affidavit with original/certified compromise; listed fresh on 02.04.2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim stay of the proceedings of Case No. 3108 of 2025 against the applicants till the next date of listing (02.04.2026); two weeks' time granted to file supplementary affidavit annexing the original/certified copy of the compromise. ¶14

Bhola @ Rajkumar vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1641 of 2026

Bhola @ Rajkumar

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Alka Upadhyay, Nandini Bhartiya
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 74

¶9

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

¶10

Sri Manish Tiwari, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record.

¶11

Learned counsel for both the parties submitted that parties settled their dispute arising out of offence punishable under Sections 333, 115(2), 352, 118(2) of B.N.S. The application to withdraw the aforesaid case is on record.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks time to file supplementary affidavit annexing the original/ certified copy of the compromise.

¶13

Put up this case as fresh on 02.04.2026.

¶14

Till the next date of listing proceedings of Case No. 3108 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 177 of 2025, under Sections 333, 115(2), 352, 118(2) of B.N.S., Police Station- Hasaayan, District Hathras, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Hathras shall remain stayed against the applicants.

¶15

January 20, 2026 Ishan

¶16

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Bhola @ Rajkumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhola @ Rajkumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guljar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others

Juvenile Delinquent a (Minor) Thru. His Mother vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Devanand Sharma @ Pancham @ Dewa vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and Another

Rajesh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Rahul vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Bablu and Another vs State of U.P. and Another