Dismissed¶15

Yogesh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC19 Apr 2026NA528/15714/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 528 BNSS quashing application; NBW (non-bailable warrant) challenged; Section 138 N.I. Act complaint case; Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj; Complaint Case No. 8747 of 2021 (Naveen Kumar Vs. Yogesh); dismissal as not pressed; liberty to file bail application; NBW kept in abeyance three weeks or till surrender; Satender Kumar Antil Vs. CBI, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922 relied on; Allahabad High Court; Deepak Verma, J.; decided April 20, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application before the trial court; NBW kept in abeyance for three weeks or till surrender, whichever is earlier; bail application to be decided expeditiously in view of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Recorded by the court as 'disposed off'. ¶15

Yogesh Vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether the N.B.W. order dated 05.07.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj in Complaint Case No. 8747 of 2021 (Naveen Kumar Vs. Yogesh) under Section 138 N.I. Act is liable to be quashed.

¶8

Court's answer

The application/petition was disposed of, the applicant having sought dismissal as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application, to which learned A.G.A. had no objection.

¶15

Ratio / Principle

If the applicant appears before the trial court within three weeks and applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶13

Key takeaways

The non-bailable warrant issued against the applicant shall remain in abeyance for three weeks from the date of the order or till the applicant surrenders before the court below, whichever is earlier.ratio¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Deepak Verma, J.), April 20, 2026 — Application under Section 528 BNSS No. 15714 of 2026 filed by Yogesh seeking quashing of the N.B.W. order dated 05.07.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj in Complaint Case No. 8747 of 2021 (Naveen Kumar Vs. Yogesh) under Section 138 N.I. Act: after arguing, counsel sought dismissal as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application, to which the A.G.A. had no objection. Petition disposed of accordingly with directions that (i) if the applicant appears before the trial court within three weeks and applies for bail, the application shall be decided expeditiously in view of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922, and (ii) the non-bailable warrant shall remain in abeyance for three weeks or till surrender, whichever is earlier.

Yogesh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sagar Goyal vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ilyas Ali and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Ishtiyak Ansari vs State of U.P. and Another

Jawahar Lal and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohammad Sharif Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Arshad and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another