Disposed¶13

Sonu Tiwari v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC15 Apr 2026NA528/15136/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 15136 of 2026, Deepak Verma, J., decided May 7, 2026. Quashing of order dated 30.07.2024 by ACJM, Bhadohi and proceedings in Complaint Case No.38426 of 2023 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (PS Gyanpur, District Bhadohi). Trial ongoing with prosecution witnesses being examined; no interference; liberty to seek settlement before trial court; application disposed of. Keywords: S. 528 BNSS, quashing, S. 138 NI Act, complaint case, mediation/settlement, trial court.

What did the court decide?

No quashing or other relief; the application was disposed of, with the applicant left free to move the trial court for consideration of any settlement between the parties. ¶13

Sonu Tiwari vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 15136 of 2026

Sonu Tiwari

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Kumud Sudhaker Tripathi, Raj Narayan Gupta : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 74

¶8

HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶10

The present 528 B.N.S.S. application has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 30.07.2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi as well as entire proceedings in Complaint Case No.38426 of 2023 (Pradeep Kumar Pandey vs. Sonu Tiwari), under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station Gyanpur, District Bhadohi.

¶11

From perusal of order-sheet, prosecution witnesses are being examined and counsel for the applicant has prayed that there is chances of mediation between the parties, if matter is referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre, High Court, Allahabad.

¶12

Since parties are appeared before trial court, he may approach trial court and make prayer before the trial court in regard to settlement between the parties, if interested. If such prayer is made before the trial court, the same will be considered by the trial court. Since prosecution witnesses are being examined, no interference is required.

¶13

Hence, the application u/s 528 B.N.S.S. stands disposed off.

¶14

May 7, 2026 SKD

¶15

(Deepak Verma,J.)

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sonu Tiwari v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Tiwari v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pintoo and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Sahil and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ramkishan Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Ilyas Ali and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Ishtiyak Ansari vs State of U.P. and Another

Sarvan @ Pintu and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another