Disposed¶16

Vinod Kumar v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC28 Mar 2026NA528/12359/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Saurabh Srivastava J., Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 12359 of 2026 (NA528), Vinod Kumar vs State of U.P. Quashing of NBW dated 13.01.2023 refused; S.T. No.669 of 2019; Case Crime No.227 of 2018; Section 307 IPC; P.S. Cantt., Prayagraj; direction to appear/surrender within three weeks; no coercive action for three weeks; disposed of on March 28, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to quash the NBW refused; applicant directed to appear/surrender before the concerned court within three weeks, with protection from coercive action until then, after which the trial court may proceed as per law. ¶16

Vinod Kumar vs State of Up and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 12359 of 2026

¶3

Vinod Kumar

¶4

	Versus		.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Gorakh Nath Tripathi	Shukla,	Keshari Nath
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 77

¶6

HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA appearing for the State.

¶8

This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of NonBailable Warrant dated 13.01.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.21, Allahabad, S.T. No.669 of 2019 (State vs. Vinod Kumar), arising out of Case Crime No.227 of 2018, under Section 307 of I.P.C., Police Station-Cantt., District-Prayagraj.

¶9

On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and charge-sheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order, can be set aside.

¶10

Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.

¶11

Lastly, learned counsel for applicant has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned in pursuance to NBW order dated 13.01.2023 to which learned AGA has no objection.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, applicant is directed to appear before the learned court concerned in pursuance to impugned NBW order dated 13.01.2023 within three weeks from today.

¶13

NA528 No. 12359 of 2026

¶14

¶15

Till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicant. After the expiry of aforesaid period of three weeks, learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law.

¶16

With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of .

¶17

(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)

¶18

March 28, 2026

¶19

K.N.

¶20

Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vinod Kumar v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vinod Kumar Vs State of Up and Another

Smt Brajesh Kumari and Another vs State of Up and Another

Devendra Pandey @ Devendra Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Vikas Thakur @ Vikas Singh vs State of Up and 3 Others

Rajendra Kumar Gazi vs State of U.P. and Another

Gaurav and Another vs State of U.P. and Another