Disposed¶18

Asheesh Tiwari and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC25 Mar 2026NA528/1177/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing application S.482 Cr.P.C/U.S. 528 BNSS not pressed; liberty to file bail before trial court within two weeks; expeditious bail per Satender Kumar Antil (2022) 10 SCC 51; impugned cognizance/summoning order 18/01/2025 ACJM-I Ayodhya/Faizabad criminal case 1561/2025; Charge Sheet 01/2024 dated 18/12/2024 case crime 263/2024 PS Cantt Ayodhya/Faizabad; BNS 115(2), 110, 351(3), 352 (IPC 323, 308, 506, 504); disposed of; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Shree Prakash Singh J; 25.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

Applicants granted liberty to appear before the trial court within two weeks and file a bail application; the bail application to be decided expeditiously in view of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). ¶18

Asheesh Tiwari and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1177 of 2026

¶3

Asheesh Tiwari And Another

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

¶7

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satyam Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 16

¶9

HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.

¶11

Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with prayer for quashing of the impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 18/01/2025 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I Ayodhya/Faizabad in criminal case no.1561/2025 "State of U.P. Vs. Asheesh Tiwari and ' others" as well as Charge Sheet No.-01/2024 dated 18/12/2024 arises out of case crime no.263/2024 under section 115(2), 110, 351(3), 352 B.N.S. (323, 308, 506, 504 I.P.C.) Police Station-Cantt, districtAyodhya/Faizabad.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.

¶13

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51 .

¶14

NA528 No. 1177 of 2026

¶15

¶16

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants.

¶17

On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶18

The application is disposed off accordingly.

¶19

(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)

¶20

March 25, 2026

¶21

V. Sinha

¶22

Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Asheesh Tiwari and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Asheesh Tiwari and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vandana Singh vs State of U.P. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Ashish Kumar Sonkar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Bajrang Alias Bajrang Goswami and 4 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and Another

Vikash and 3 others vs State of U.P. through Addl. Principal Secretary Home and 4 others

Manoj Kumar Nishad @ Manoj Kumar and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Chandra Bali Singh @ Chandra Bali and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. the Addl. Chief Secy. Govt. of U.P. Lko.