Disposed¶14

Master Azhaan Ali Thru. His Father and Natural Guardian Musarrat Ali v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 4 Others

Allahabad HC24 Mar 2026HABC/328/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 14; Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 328 of 2024; minor petitioner Master Azhaan Ali through father and natural guardian Musarrat Ali; respondents State of U.P. through Principal Secretary Home and 4 others (private opposite parties 4 & 5 absent, no counter affidavit); mediation unsuccessful per report dated 22.09.2025; three weeks' final time granted to file counter affidavit; listing week commencing 20.04.2026; Single Bench of Subhash Vidyarthi, J.; order dated March 24, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim procedural directions only: three weeks' and no more time granted to the opposite parties to file counter affidavit; case to be listed in the week commencing 20.04.2026. ¶14

Master Azhaan Ali Thru. His Father and Natural Guardian Musarrat Ali vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 328 of 2024

¶3

Master Azhaan Ali Thru. His Father And Natural Guardian Musarrat Ali

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Ramakar Shu	kla
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A., Sachin	Srivastava	, Shakti Kumar
	Verma, Sheo	Sahai Lal	Srivastav, Syed
	Mohammad	Haider	Rizv, Yashab
	Husain Rizvi

¶8

Court No. - 14

¶9

HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

¶10

Case called out.

¶11

Sri Ramakar Shukla, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.D. Bhatt, the learned Additional Government Advocate-I for the State are present. Nobody is present on behalf of private opposite parties no. 4 & 5.

¶12

The matter had earlier been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre and the Mediation Centre has submitted a report dated 22.09.2025 stating that the mediation has remained unsuccessful as the parties could not arrive at a settlement.

¶13

Neither any counter affidavit has been filed nor is anyone present for the opposite parties no. 4 & 5.

¶14

In the interest of justice, the case is adjourned giving three weeks' and no more time to the opposite parties to file counter affidavit.

¶15

List this case in the week commencing 20.04.2026.

¶16

(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)

¶17

March 24, 2026 Pradeep/-

¶18

Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Master Azhaan Ali Thru. His Father and Natural Guardian Musarrat Ali v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Master Azhaan Ali Thru. His Father and Natural Guardian Musarrat Ali v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Neha Bano Thru. Her Husband Gulab Babu vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Lko. and 3 Others

Brijesh Kumar @ Brijesh Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. of U.P. Lko.

Sumbul Jahan Thru Her Next Friend/ Husband Mohd. Afzal vs State of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home Lucknow and Ors.

Bharti Lakhmani vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Joginder Prasad @ Joginder Pershad Pandey vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Daya Ram vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. / Addl. Chif Secy. Revenue Lko. and 3 Others