Criminal revision against interim maintenance order under Section 12 DV Act was dismissed in limine as barred by the statutory appeal remedy under Section 29; liberty granted to file appeal before Sessions Court with delay condonation application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 124 of 2026
Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Verma
.....Revisionist(s)
| Versus |
|---|
| Addl. Acjm Judge, Room No. 6, Another |
Lucknow | And .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Revisionist(s) | : | Vivek Raghubanshi |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : | G.A. |
Court No. - 27
HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.
CRLRD No. 124 of 2026
2
before him under the Act, the Magistrate may pass such interim orders as he deems just and proper. Instant impugned order has been passed on an application made under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
March 26, 2026
Mohd. Sharif
(Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision lies against an interim maintenance order under the DV Act when Section 29 provides a statutory appeal to the Sessions Court?
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Verma
Addl. ACJM Judge, Room No. 6, Lucknow
Smt. Avantika Kumari
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
