Disposed¶8

X Juvenile v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC10 Feb 2026CRLR/960/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

juvenile revisionist; Criminal Revision No. 960 of 2026; Allahabad High Court; Manoj Bajaj, J.; Section 180 B.N.S.S.; prosecutrix voluntarily left house; parents attempting marriage against wishes; three years acquaintance; nearly same age; custody since 25.09.2025; trial yet to commence; fresh notice to opposite party no. 2 returnable 10.03.2026; counsel Ajeet Kumar Singh; G.A.; digitally signed Rajeev Kumar Sachdeva.

What did the court decide?

Issue of fresh notice to opposite party no. 2, returnable on 10.03.2026; matter pending. ¶8

X Juvenile v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

X Juvenile v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dr Vicky vs State of U.P. and Another

Juvenile X vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Kamal Hasan vs State of U.P. through Its Principal Secretary (Home) at Lucknow, U.P. and Another

X Juvenile vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

X Juvenile vs State of U.P. and Another

Fakeer Chand vs State of U.P. and Another