Criminal revision against a Domestic Violence Act monetary relief, residence order and Rs.75,000 compensation. The State raised a preliminary objection on maintainability citing the statutory appeal under Section 29 of the D.V. Act. Hearing adjourned for further submissions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 419 of 2026
Vijay Kumar Verma
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
| State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. H Others |
ome Deptt. Lko. And 3 | ... | ..Opposite | Party(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Revisionist(s) | : Raghvendra P. Shashank Vikram |
Singh, Verma |
Mohd. | Sheraj, |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 27
HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.
April 15, 2026 Mohd. Sharif
(Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vijay Kumar Verma
State of U.P. thru Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Others
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
