Dismissed¶18

Shekhdidar Ali v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC23 Feb 2026CRLR/1401/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Shekhdidar Ali v. State of U.P. and 3 Others, Criminal Revision No. 1401 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, decided February 24, 2026, by Abdul Shahid, J. Revision against the CJM, Jaunpur order dated 16.12.2025 in Misc. Application No. 300 of 2025 registering the revisionist's Section 173(4) B.N.S.S. application (200-gram gold B.C. scheme dispute) as a complaint was dismissed; the Court found no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order.

What did the court decide?

The Court found no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order dated 16.12.2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur. ¶17

Shekhdidar Ali Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1401 of 2026

Shekhdidar Ali

.....Revisionist(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 3 Others	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s)	: Vikash Chandra Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 87

¶7

HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist.

¶9

The present criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 16.12.2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur, in Misc. Application No. 300 of 2025 ( Shekhdidar Ali vs. Rajesh Kumar Soni and others ), under Section 173(4) B.N.S.S., Police Station Kotwali, District Jaunpur.

¶10

Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist filed an application under Section 173(4) B.N.S.S., which has been registered as a complaint. It is contended that investigation is required in the said matter and, therefore, it ought to have been registered as a State case.

¶11

It is further submitted that the matter involves 200 grams of gold, which is a valuable metal, and hence investigation is necessary. Learned counsel submits that the revisionist is a technician who prepares jewellery in the Sarafa Market and works there. One Rajesh Seth, son of Hori Lal Soni, has a shop at the said place and carries on the business of running a B.C. scheme of gold. The revisionist, being a simple person belonging to an ordinary family, and in order to safeguard his future, became a member of a 200-gram gold B.C. scheme run by Rajesh Seth on his assurance. He was enrolled as member at serial no. 13.

¶12

At the time of initiation of the B.C., Rajesh Seth informed him that he was required to pay instalments for 15 months equivalent to the value of the gold. After completion of 15 months, when the revisionist approached Rajesh Seth

¶13

CRLR No. 1401 of 2026

¶14

¶15

and demanded his share under the B.C. scheme, neither was any amount returned nor was the gold delivered. It is further alleged that the son of Rajesh Seth abused him and extended threats to kill him.

¶16

All the aforesaid facts are within the knowledge of the revisionist and do not require any independent investigation.

¶17

Upon consideration of the submissions advanced and perusal of the record, this Court finds that there is neither any illegality nor irregularity in the impugned order.

¶18

The criminal revision lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed.

¶19

February 24, 2026 K.K. Maurya

¶20

(Abdul Shahid,J.)

¶21

Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shekhdidar Ali v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shekhdidar Ali v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

X (Informant) Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rampal Sharma Vs State of U.P. and 22 Others

Ayush Sharma Alias Anshu Sharma and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Sunil Kumar vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Arpit Rai Vs State of U.P. and Another

Hira Singh Pal Vs State of U.P. and Another