Dismissed¶7

Makbool Khan and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Allahabad HC8 Jan 2026CRLP/813/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 813 of 2025, decided January 8, 2026, coram Abdul Moin, J. and Babita Rani, J. Petition by Makbool Khan and others seeking quashing of FIR No. 0308 of 2024, Sections 406, 420, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Bazarsukul, District Amethi. Charge sheet dated 04.03.2025 submitted to supervisory authority on 07.03.2025. Court declined to conduct a mini trial on FIR/charge-sheet allegations, relying on Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others, 2025 INSC 1287; held no case on merits made out; writ petition dismissed with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy. Petitioners unrepresented at hearing despite notice.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to pursue appropriate remedy. ¶7

Makbool Khan and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 813 of 2025

¶3

Makbool Khan And Others

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amiruddin Khan, Abhisek Kumar Dixit, Arpit Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 11

¶9

HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.

¶10

Case called out. None appears for the petitioners despite a notice having been affixed on the notice board that the matter would be taken at 02.15 PM..

¶11

Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No. 0308 of 2024, under Sections 406, 420, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Bazarsukul, District Amethi.

¶12

Learned AGA on the basis of instructions received from Shri Satya Prakash Tiwari, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Bazarsukul, District Amethi states that a charge sheet dated 04.03.2025 has been submitted before the supervisory authority on 07.03.2025.

¶13

Learned AGA further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioners/accused is borne out.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the FIR and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioners in the instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC 1287 .

¶15