Smt. Kajal Rajput and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC20 Mar 2026CRLP/5969/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim no-arrest protection; Section 87 BNS; Case Crime No. 939 of 2025; Police Station-Banna Devi; District-Aligarh; adjournment due to A.G.A. lacking instructions; next date 22.04.2026; Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 5969 of 2026; Kajal Rajput v. State of U.P.

What did the court decide?

Hearing adjourned; interim protection from arrest granted to petitioners in Case Crime No. 939 of 2025 (Section 87 BNS), Police Station-Banna Devi, District-Aligarh, till the next date fixed; matter to re-appear for orders as fresh on 22.04.2026. ¶¶12

Smt. Kajal Rajput and Another vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5969 of 2026

¶2

Smt. Kajal Rajput And Another

¶3

.....Petitioner(s)

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of U.P. And 2 Others

¶6

.....Respondent(s)

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Amir Khan
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 49

¶9

HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J.

¶10

Heard Mr. Amir Khan, the learned counsel for petitioners and the learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents 1 and 2.

¶11

Perused the record.

¶12

On the matter being taken up, the learned counsel for petitioners fairly submits that since the manner in which marriage of parties was solemnized has not been detailed in present writ petition, therefore, the hearing of present writ petition be adjourned, so as to enable him to file a supplementary affidavit explaining the above.

¶13