Dismissed¶15

Maruf Husain and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC4 May 2026CRLP/5242/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 5242 of 2023 (decided May 5, 2026): petition to quash FIR in Case Crime No.197 of 2023 (Sections 376, 506 erstwhile IPC; Section 3/4 DP Act) dismissed because charge sheet CS 320/2023 already filed on collected evidence; liberty granted to challenge charge sheet before appropriate forum; petitioners absent, AGA present.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to question the charge sheet in an appropriate proceeding at the appropriate forum; petition dismissed and consigned to records with the aforesaid liberty ¶15

Maruf Husain and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5242 of 2023

¶3

Maruf Husain And 5 Others

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others	...	..Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Girish Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Amit Kumar Pandey, G.A., Singh, Narsingh Pandey	Manoj Kumar

¶6

Court No. - 1

¶7

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.

¶8

List is being revised.

¶9

This writ petition questions the first information report in connection with Case Crime No.197 of 2023 under Sections 376, 506 of the erstwhile IPC and Section 3/4 of DP Act, however, nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petition, however, learned AGA for the State is present.

¶10

Office has submitted following report:

¶11

"It is most humbly submitted that as per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, chargesheet no.CS 320/2023 has been filed.

¶12

Therefore, In view of above, the case is put up for order before Hon'ble Court."

¶13

In view of the fact that charge sheet in the case has already been submitted by the police after collecting evidence at its level finding petitioners' involvement in the offence complained of, in our considered view it would be appropriate that the charge sheet so filed may be questioned in an appropriate proceeding at appropriate forum.

¶14

Accordingly, we decline to grant any further indulgence in the matter.

¶15

Petition is, accordingly dismissed, consigned to records with aforesaid liberty.

¶16

May 5, 2026 Mohit

¶17

(Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Maruf Husain and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maruf Husain and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Amree Pharmaceuticals vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council Saharanpur Division, Saharanpur and Another

Smith and Schnider Facility Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others

A.U. Small Finance Bank Ltd. vs State of Up and 5 Others

Syed Tasvir Haider and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Preeti and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Manoj Kumar Pandey Vs Registrar General, High Court of Judicature Allahabad and Another