Dismissed¶17

Preeti and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC4 May 2026CRLP/5278/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 5278 of 2022; Preeti v. State of U.P.; FIR quashing writ petition dismissed; chargesheet already filed after evidence collection; challenge to be raised against chargesheet before appropriate forum; Case Crime No. 106 of 2022; Sections 363, 504 erstwhile IPC; decision dated May 5, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty conserved to the petitioners to question the chargesheet in an appropriate proceeding at the appropriate forum ¶17

Preeti and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5278 of 2022

¶2

Preeti And 3 Others

¶3

.....Petitioner(s)

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of U.P. And 3 Others

¶6

.....Respondent(s)

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Ashutosh Kumar Gautam
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 1

¶9

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.

¶10

List is being revised.

¶11

This writ petition questions the first information report in connection with Case Crime No.106 of 2022 under Sections 363, 504 of the erstwhile IPC, however, nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petition, however, learned AGA for the State is present.

¶12

3. Office has submitted following report:

¶13

"It is most humbly submitted that as per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, chargesheet has been filed.

¶14

Therefore, In view of above, the case is put up for order before Hon'ble Court."

¶15

In view of the fact that charge sheet in the case has already been submitted by the police after collecting evidence at its level finding petitioners' involvement in the offence complained of, in our considered view it would be appropriate that the charge sheet so filed may be questioned in an appropriate proceeding at appropriate forum.

¶16

Accordingly, we decline to grant any further indulgence in the matter.

¶17

Petition is, accordingly dismissed, consigned to records with aforesaid liberty.

¶18

May 5, 2026 Mohit

¶19

(Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)

¶20

Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Preeti and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Preeti and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Amree Pharmaceuticals vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council Saharanpur Division, Saharanpur and Another

Smith and Schnider Facility Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others

A.U. Small Finance Bank Ltd. vs State of Up and 5 Others

Syed Tasvir Haider and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Manoj Kumar Pandey Vs Registrar General, High Court of Judicature Allahabad and Another

M/S Amree Pharmaceuticals Vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council Saharanpur Division, Saharanpur and Another