Dismissed¶15

Shashank @ Shashank Bind @ Bholu v. the State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC22 Apr 2026CRLP/21002/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 21002 of 2025; Shashank @ Shashank Bind @ Bholu v. State of U.P.; quashing of FIR not entertained after filing of charge sheet; Case Crime No. 442 of 2025; Sections 137(2), 87 BNS; Charge Sheet No. A- 265/24; P.S. Sarai Khwaja, District Jaunpur; petition dismissed with liberty to challenge charge sheet before appropriate forum; coram Ajit Kumar and Indrajeet Shukla, JJ.; decided April 23, 2026; ex parte appearance by petitioner side; Additional Government Advocate Anand Vikram Singh for State.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to question the charge sheet in an appropriate proceeding at appropriate forum ¶15

Shashank @ Shashank Bind @ Bholu Vs the State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21002 of 2025

¶3

Shashank @ Shashank Bind @ Bholu

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

	Versus
The State Of U.P. And 3 Others	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Vijay Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 1

¶7

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.

¶8

List is being revised.

¶9

This writ petition questions the first information report in connection with Case Crime No. 442 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87 BNS, Charge Sheet No. A- 265/24, P.S. Sarai Khwaja, District Jaunpur, however, nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petition, however, Sri Anand Vikram Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State is present.

¶10

Office has submitted following report:

¶11

"It is most humbly submitted that as per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, chargesheet has been filed.

¶12

Therefore, in view of above, the case is put up for order before Hon'ble Court."

¶13

In view of the fact that charge sheet in the case has already been submitted by the police after collecting evidence at its level finding petitioners' involvement in the offence complained of, in our considered view it would be appropriate that the charge sheet so filed is questioned in an appropriate proceeding at appropriate forum.

¶14

Accordingly, we decline to grant any further indulgence in the matter.

¶15

Petition is accordingly dismissed, consigned to records with aforesaid liberty.

¶16

April 23, 2026 v.k. updh.

¶17

(Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shashank @ Shashank Bind @ Bholu v. the State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shashank @ Shashank Bind @ Bholu v. the State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shahnawaz vs Union of India and 2 Others

Arvind Kumar Upadhyay vs Union of India and 5 Others

Shivam Gupta and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shashi Bhushan vs Punjab National Bank and 3 Others

Shahvez Abdullah vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

M/S. Maya Lime Works vs State of U.P. and 4 Others