Indu Devi v. Yogeshwar Singh, S.D.M.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt application against an SDM; notice served but opposite party unrepresented. Court issued bailable warrant against the opposite party and listed the matter for a future date. No merits decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5832 of 2024
Indu Devi
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Yogeshwar Singh, S.D.M.
.....Opposite Party(s)
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Ram Prasad Dubey |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : |
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
- Office report dated 17.07.2025 indicates that the notice issued to the opposite party has been served but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party.
- Learned Standing Counsel states that he has no instructions in the matter.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Indu Devi
- other
Yogeshwar Singh, S.D.M.
Coram
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CAPL/5832/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
- Order 2 — this page · Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court