Arif @ Haji Arif v. Sri Arun Dikshit
Case brief
What is this about?
Non-appearance of opposite party in a civil contempt application despite service; bailable warrant issued against him through the concerned C.J.M., matter listed for further hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5734 of 2024
Arif @ Haji Arif
.....Applicant(s)
Versus Sri Arun Dikshit .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijay Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
- Office report dated 17.07.2025 repeated on 31.03.2026 indicates that the notice issued to the opposite party has been served but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party.
- Learned Standing Counsel states that he has no instructions in the matter.
- Let a bailable warrant be issued against the opposite party through the concerned C.J.M. fixing 08.05.2026.
- List this matter on 08.05.2026.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Arif @ Haji Arif
- respondent
Sri Arun Dikshit
Coram
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CAPL/5734/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
- Order 2 — this page · Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court