Dismissed¶13

Km. Nidhi v. Amrit Abhijat, Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Civil Secrtt., U.P. Govt., Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Jan 2026CAPL/2762/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow), Contempt Application (Civil) No. 2762 of 2024, Km. Nidhi v. Amrit Abhijat, Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Civil Secrtt., U.P. Govt., Lko. and another, decided 06-02-2026 by Manish Kumar, J. Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous upon admitted compliance with the underlying Writ Court judgment and order; compliance affidavit taken on record; notice discharged; applicant left free to pursue other legal remedies. Counsel: Arvind Kumar Vishwakarma for applicant; Savitra Vardhan Singh for opposite parties. No statutes or case-law cited.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the contempt application as infructuous, discharge of notice, and liberty reserved to the applicant to pursue remedies permissible under the law if still aggrieved. ¶13

Km. Nidhi vs Amrit Abhijat, Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Civil Secrtt., U.P. Govt., Lko. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2762 of 2024

Km. Nidhi

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

Amrit Abhijat, Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Civil Secrtt., U.P. Govt., Lko. And Another

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Arvind Kumar Vishwakarma
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Savitra Vardhan Singh

¶9

Court No. - 8

¶10

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.

¶11

Respondent has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record.

¶12

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the judgment and order passed by Writ Court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the applicant to avail the remedy, as may be permissible under the law, if she is still aggrieved.

¶13

As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.

¶14

Notice, if any, is hereby discharged.

¶15

It is always open to the applicant to avail the remedies, as may be permissible under the law, if she is still aggrieved.

¶16

February 6, 2026

¶17

Ashish

¶18

(Manish Kumar,J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Km. Nidhi v. Amrit Abhijat, Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Civil Secrtt., U.P. Govt., Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Km. Nidhi v. Amrit Abhijat, Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Civil Secrtt., U.P. Govt., Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mrityunjay Kumar vs Kumar Harsh, Zila Adikari District Sultanpur and Another

Rama Shankar Giri vs Shri Anupam Gupta, Managing Director, U.P. Forest Corporation, Lko.

Pramod Kumar Kashyap vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Mewa Lal vs Shrimati Priyanka Niranjan, District Magistrate Gonda

Ranjit Singh Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar and Another vs Dr. Vijay Bahadur Dwivedi, Director Horticulture and Food Processing, Lko. and Another

Nizamuddin vs Mr. Shubham Singh, Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office Campus Lko.