Disposed¶14

Susheela v. Smt. Isha Priya, D.M., Ambedkar Nagar

Allahabad HC30 Apr 2026CAPL/1701/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim adjournment order in a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench (Saurabh Lavania, J.). Key terms: maintainability/entertainability of contempt application; contempt jurisdiction; Susheela v. DM Ambedkar Nagar; supplementary affidavit taken on record; authorities noted include J.S. Parihar (AIR 1997 SC 113), Lalit Mathur ((2000) 10 SCC 285) and other Supreme Court and Allahabad decisions; case adjourned to 04.05.2026. No ratio or final determination; useful only to track the pending maintainability objection.

What the court decided

AI extract

Susheela vs Smt. Isha Priya, D.M., Ambedkar Nagar — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1701 of 2026

Susheela

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

Smt. Isha Priya, D.M., Ambedkar Nagar

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Pawan Kumar Pandey, Vittan
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:

¶9

Court No. - 7

¶10

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

¶11

Supplementary affidavit filed in the Court today is taken on record.

¶12

Heard.

¶13

On being confronted regarding entertainability/maintainability of the instant contempt application/petition after taking note of the observations made in various pronouncements, including rendered in the case(s) of J.S. Parihar Vs. Ganpat Duggar and others, AIR 1997 Supreme Court 113; Lalit Mathur Vs. L. Maheswara Rao, (2000) 10 SCC 285; Ashok Kumar Pandey Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh, D.I.O.S., Ballia and others, 2003 (5) AWC 4393; Brahma Deo Tiwari Vs. Alok Tandon, District Magaistrate, Allahabad, 2004 (1) AWC 543; Shail Raj Kishore, Secretary, Education Basic, U.P. Lucknow and others, 2004 (3) AWC 2444; Anil Kumar Shahi (2) Vs. Prof. Ram Sevak Yadav, (2008) 14 Supreme Court Cases 115 and Hari Raj Kishore Vs. Shiv Prasad Dubey, 2007(1) JCLR 639 , on being confronted, the learned counsel for the applicant says that some reasonable time may be granted to address the Court on this aspect of the case.

¶14