Dismissed¶13

Hari Prasad v. Mr. Prafull Kumar Sharma, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Raebareli

Allahabad HC3 Apr 2026CAPL/1252/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Saurabh Lavania, J.; Contempt Application (Civil) No. 1252 of 2026; decided 23 April 2026; contempt application dismissed as writ court order complied with; nothing survives in petition; notices, if any, discharged; applicant Hari Prasad; opposite party SDM Raebareli Prafull Kumar Sharma.

What did the court decide?

The writ court's order having been complied with and nothing surviving in the petition, the instant contempt application is dismissed. ¶13

Hari Prasad vs Mr. Prafull Kumar Sharma, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Raebareli — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1252 of 2026

Hari Prasad

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

Mr. Prafull Kumar Sharma, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Raebareli

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Sandeep Kumar, Arti Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:

¶9

Court No. - 7

¶10

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

¶11

1. Heard.

¶12

Sri Sandeep Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner very fairly stated that the order of the writ court has been complied with and therefore nothing survives in the instant petition and the same may be dismissed accordingly.

¶13

Accordingly, the instant contempt application is dismissed.

¶14

Notice(s), if any, stands discharged.

¶15

April 23, 2026 Jyoti/-

¶16

(Saurabh Lavania,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Hari Prasad v. Mr. Prafull Kumar Sharma, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Raebareli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hari Prasad v. Mr. Prafull Kumar Sharma, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Raebareli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vijay Bhan vs Atul Kumar, Tahsildar (in Charge) Tahsil Karnailganj Distt. Gonda

Manju Devi Alias Manju vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko. and 5 Others

Shri Kant Tiwari vs Sri Kumar Harsh Dist. Magistrate Dist. Sultanpur

Sudhir Kumar Tewari vs Santosh Sinha, Unit Head Mankapur A.G.M. I.T.I. Ltd. Gonda

Pramod Kumar Singh, Thru. His Power of Attorney Manoj Kumar and Another vs Kartikey Singh U.P. Ziladhikari Tehsil Fatehpur Distt. Barabanki

Ahibaran Singh Yadav vs Yogesh Kumar, Commissioner/ Registrar Cooperative Societies Lko. and Another