Laxman Singh @ Satyam v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Laxman Singh @ Satyam v. State of U.P., Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9059 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 70, Santosh Rai, J., order dated March 17, 2026: interlocutory directions — counsel to explain criminal history per sub-rule 7 of Rule 18, Chapter XVIII, Allahabad High Court Rules 1952, and file injury report/medical evidence and doctors' statements by affidavit; A.G.A. to seek fresh instructions on investigation status; matter put up on 28.03.2026 as fresh; bail application not decided on merits; no cases cited, no amounts.
What did the court decide?
Direction to applicant's counsel to explain the criminal history of the applicant in compliance of sub-rule 7 of Rule 18 of Chapter XVIII of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952, and to bring on record by affidavit the complete medical evidence/injury report of the injured and the statements of the doctors.