Disposed¶9

Sonmati Devi v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Mar 2026BAIL/8969/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Sameer Jain, J.; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 8969 of 2026; Sonmati Devi versus State of U.P.; bail application adjourned; AGA instructions not received; one week time granted to AGA; case to be listed again as fresh on 25.03.2026; order dated March 17, 2026; Court No. 67; no merits adjudicated; no citation value.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment: one week's time (and no more) granted to the learned AGA to obtain instructions; case to be listed again as fresh on 25.03.2026. The bail application was not decided on merits. ¶9

Sonmati Devi vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8969 of 2026

Sonmati Devi

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Rahul Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 67

¶6

HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.

¶7

Sri Rahul Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Kunwar Tejendra Bahadur, learned AGA for the State are presetn.

¶8

Learned AGA apprised the Court that till date he could not receive instructions and prays for and is granted one week and no more time to obtain instructions.

¶9

Put up this case again as fresh on 25.03.2026.

(Sameer Jain,J.)

March 17, 2026

Shahroz

Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sonmati Devi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonmati Devi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Sonkar vs State of U.P.

Raja Sonkar and Another vs State of U.P.

Vimlesh Mishra vs State of U.P.

Ziyaul Haq vs State of U.P.

Raj Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Rinku vs State of U.P.